They are the ideas and their implementation to determine the competence

We returned to a theme "controversial" here on the blog.

Recovering some passages of a text over one year, published here.

How can we say that Coach Y is better than X, because only won one or two championships that his professional colleague? If the two were not in the same context, with the exact same weapons, how can we conclude that X is better than Y because you won? What tells us that Y in context and with the arms of X does not win too?

Since the phenomenon Mourinho coaches are regarded as gods. Gods in the sense that the victories, and especially the defeats spend more for themselves than for who actually play the game.

Continue football fans to ignore that there are opponents. Valiant and which also affect the entire game.

"The coach needs to make weapons (organization) so that their athletes are more than individualities in the field but who know relate to each other, with collective principles. Occupying the space and to move with and without ball, offensively and defensively, according to common ideas. In this space we value that apart from achieving create these principles, they do so at all times of the game. Treat all times with due importance, and as such have the team prepared to play the game goes. Having done so, the best coach in the world may well lose to the worst. It's just that humans are playing the game. "

When choosing a coach, is mainly looking at your game model. For the behavior of his team at different times of the game and this play fits into the philosophy of the club. 

Mourinho was a right choice for FC Porto, not because of Uniao Leiria had added many points, but because playing with big club ideas.Assumed the office in games, was an aggressive offensive team in the organization, and controlled as few transitions and positions in defensive organization. 

That's why nine months ago there were some posts on a "new" Portuguese coach. Here. 

"Paulo Sousa is not now a much talked about name in Portugal. However reveals much superior qualities to those who are being revelations by."

Came the tie with FC Porto and copious defeat the Dragon, he brought a lot of criticism. After the coach was not so good. It is utterly false. It's because? Because it is not for a result or a trophy that one should assess the competence of the manager! The ideas are the same.Whether they are good, are not the losses that determine the quality of the coach. Does anyone believe that Guardiola would be the first four of the Portuguese Liga serving Arouca? And if so, would not be able to train a large? To walk in the middle of the table? And as we realize that we could have this ability ...? The ideas that implements because of course! By the way his team is positioned in the field and react in each of the moments of the game.