A philosopher, studying football, once asked: why attack a computer? What impulse motivates l? Sometimes it is a mystery. Johan Cruyff responded by inventing a machine optimistic football. Vitalism ball, elegant, it became clear, bright in the bands.
"What is the forte of Manolo? Uncheck. Well, we'll let you free. "
Spain, disciple, and sequel emulates Cruyff , mixed with pure - blooded genius of Luis, who saw the possibilities of Spanish softly, then passed by consensus continuity with Del Bosque, yesterday seemed to have no reason to.
I could tell friendly party, and something more.
Spain looked like a normal computer. Without attributes, sometimes even irritating, which appeared in the last decade.
Away from the area, detached, separate lines and with very little ball .There was a sense of tentativeness, improvisation on the computer, and then two small disasters: one at the exit of the ball. It was not Busquets and San Jose is not the same. Ramos gave many balls as in the Madrid defense and Linker-media looked like a broken slope.
Italy, especially , he attacked by the right wing. He was passing everything, even Del Bosque fell , with desplome- feeling overwhelmed by the impetuous linesman. The linesmen are despistadísimos individuals.
The fact is that the Spanish left wing was like a tactical gibberish it took to get ready.
They were in the starting Aduriz, either in the first control and playing back; Morata, in regions where Villa began, and Thiago, who only left a great detail in the first part, with oh general audience.
Morata may be the fitter . Its speed and power are irrepressible. He is a player that can only be a starter.
Italy had a couple of arrivals where Candreva and a shot of Pellé, soft or distant, that De Gea interrupted with authority. Spain tried in 37 with a very malicious Morata pass to Aduriz, suddenly fallen 'offside'.
What fault was the motivation? Alta, the 'split balls', which are like the statistics of hunger, were Italians.
How much could be due to a general problem? Lot, or at least a considerable part because E spaña did not have the ball, your average no "dialogue" and the usual gear transmission peloteril disappeared.
Cruyff was a music that was transmitted to Guardiola and company. A music that Spain, somewhat slower, got learned. A festive pasodoble in Rondos.
Without Cruyff, without his influence, and without Xavi, Iniesta and Busquets no, would that indecisive Spain mediocrity? Scariest thought.
Antonio Conte is an appreciable coach . Many times, Italy seemed more done, more conjoined to Spain. Conte was bald as a player and as a coach has Pelaz. What things.
In the second half, his team came out the same, but Spain was remade with the entry of Nacho and Koke. The initial 4-1-4-1 became a more integral and convincing 4-4-2.
Italy then left his initial conceit of touch and became contragolpeadora.There appeared De Gea, insurance and stop the gesture .
After 66 minutes, a cross from the left of Italy finished it off Insigne clearly. He protested offside, but not found. Juanfran hyperactivity empowered the Italian.
In the first part, Spain has reached the left; in the second, by both.
Immediately he reacted selection in a dead ball. Topped Morata head and the rebound hunted Aduriz . It was a beautiful goal between two pure nines, a goal in tandem, though Morata departed offside.
Nothing mark, Aduriz was replaced by Silva. Luckily one minute before the change is not processed.
Positive conclusions: De Gea, who kept stopping, is the relay . It has reached the Euro in place. Anything else would be a generational suicide.This was the smooth transition! There has been no noise, no trauma. Del Bosque is masterful in these things.
Another good news were the nines. Spain has with them other packaging and a plan B.
It was a rather bad game the day he died Cruyff. Without him, the soccer fields again seem narrow.
Niciun comentariu:
Trimiteți un comentariu